RPGG
2024.12.18
"I hit it with my instaban-hammer."
Moderators of RPGG deleted my account for posting evidence supporting Zak.
[q="dysjunct"]
Maybe some are legit people with an interest in RPG discussion though, so who knows. What’s his goal here?[/q]
I have legit interests in RPGs. This is verifiable.
I’m not here to advertise my web links or rpg products, however.
Please do not instantly assume I am a bad person for saying the following opinion. I have a right to an opinion of my own. I believe I am using reasonable logic here. Also, you did ask.
I believe Zak also has legit interests in RPG. The fact he is an RPG designer with awards for his products it is not something to ignore. He probably has more legit interest than most people as it’s his income, his career - while most gamers are consumers.
What are his goal here?
Have you seen ReadyPlayerOne? There is a competition in it. Zaks ‘agenda’ to run a competition for people to win a copy of his book for engagement with the RPG community on the forums, seems altruistic.
It has revealed a panic reaction from certain specific people who are part of a witch-hunt against him. This has escalated to hysteria levels. It is the satanic panic of this generation. Zak is being publicly persecuted, his followers are being publicly persecuted.
That’s really weird behaviour from the community. Is Zak truly that bad? I’ve read his blogs and seen his work. He’s an autistic savant, often misunderstood, as autistic savants are.
So I dug deeper to find out what is going on here. I decided to get to know Zak for myself. I started working with him. I opted in for the competition.
It is because I want to get to the bottom of things and find out what’s really going on. Rather than to ‘fit in’ with people passing judgement to character-assassinate somebody who I respect as an artist.
This is what I discovered.
Zak has been outcast from a community which has damaged his reputation and his career. That community did not ask to see evidence before scape-goating him. That is not Zaks bad. It is public persecution.
The autistic trait of wanting Truth to prevail, plus defending himself against allegations, motivated Zak to run a campaign of debunking the allegations with actual evidence.
IMO that is a sane thing to do.
I have seen the evidence. It is real.
Zak asks people to see the evidence.
Many people refuse to. People showing the evidence are being banned from forums and doxxed by people who do not believe in evidence based truth.
That is all this is.
Zak has presented evidence to show that he has cleared his name, repeatedly. The people accusing him of things have been exposed as liars. There are confessions of this.
In the interests of humanitarianism, and to answer questions asked on this thread, I will risk being banned and doxxed by presenting the evidence here.
Not because I want a book. It is because Zak is being witch-hunted by liars. It’s that black and white. Truth is still truth even if nobody believes in it. I do.
“All it takes for evil to win is for good men to stand by and do nothing.”
Except those are not good men. Good men fight for justice. What is happening to Zak is unjust.
[q="dysjunct"]What’s his goal here?[/q]
In response to a question asked in this forum, a question I also asked, I did some research.
The complete text of "Get at him" is here.
https://www.tumblr.com/armsinthewronghands/157572020868/complete-text-of-the-get-at-him-post
The complete text of the Destroy post
https://www.tumblr.com/armsinthewronghands/157572086858/complete-text-of-the-destroy-post
Those are responses to people lying on the internet.
Excerpts from a defamation case Zak won:
The claims that those statements are "true" are lies.
The Most Recent court result:
"sock puppet allegations"
re: sappelcline are here:
https://www.tumblr.com/armsinthewronghands/167447123123/timeline-of-the-zak-wars
Before I get banned for defending justice, I might as well drop these links to:
And the audio confessions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GJAJNbF2Tg
The Cam Banks case:
Civ-2021-044-169
District Court North Shore Registry
“All it takes for evil to win is a good men to standby and do nothing.”
Except those are not good men.
Good men fight for justice.
Bad men call that spam.
Many people don't understand how legal language and court processes work, and that can cause confusion. In legal terms, the phrase "false claim" doesn't mean someone is lying. Instead, it means the court has decided that a specific point isn't relevant to the case and won't be considered. The terms "true" and "false" in this context are just tools to decide which facts the court will focus on, not a judgment about whether something is honest or truthful.
Courts don't deal with absolute truth—they operate based on rules and procedures to make decisions. It's frustrating to see people misunderstand these terms and use that misunderstanding to fuel personal agendas. When a court says something is "false," it only means the judge has ruled it doesn't belong in the case. It has nothing to do with whether it's honest or true in the broader sense outside of the courtroom.
The points you cherry-picked are taken out of context and show a misunderstanding of due process. The judge's decision to consider her statements "true" for inclusion in due process was based on the sheer number of such statements she made, not their accuracy in reflecting real events. Fewer statements might have led to a different decision. This reflects how the court system operates. Notably, the same document also acknowledges instances where she was found to be lying. Despite manipulation of the proceedings, Zak still prevailed (see conclusion).
A thoughtful and fair-minded individual would consider all these facts before forming judgments or cherry-picking things out of context.
The actions of those directly involved in the case are their responsibility. However, third parties who engage in harassment or defamation campaigns bear responsibility for their own actions—a separate matter entirely.